Lebanese army rejects military coordination with Israel
The US-brokered deal between Israel and Lebanon is now at risk.
Recently, despite a security agreement between Lebanon and Israel mediated by the United States, the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) have refused to establish direct military coordination with Israel. This situation has arisen as the U.S. is attempting to implement a permanent security arrangement between the two countries. The U.S. wanted the Lebanese army to cooperate with the Israeli army to eliminate Hezbollah.
Foundation of the Agreement
According to reports, the American proposal suggested increasing the deployment of the Lebanese army in parts of southern Lebanon and a phased withdrawal of the Israeli army. Under this, a joint military coordination mechanism was planned. However, the Lebanese army has made it clear that it will not maintain any direct contact with Israel. Their priority is to work only through the existing international monitoring arrangements and United Nations mechanisms.
Political Contradictions
There are already political differences within Lebanon regarding this agreement. Hezbollah and its allied parties oppose it, considering it against Lebanon's sovereignty. They argue that this arrangement prioritizes Israeli interests and increases external pressure on the country. On the other hand, the U.S. argues that if only the government army's presence is ensured in southern Lebanon, it will help establish permanent peace on the border.
Implementation of the Agreement
Experts believe that the most challenging aspect of the agreement is its implementation. The Lebanese army will have to maintain political balance within the country while ensuring that their actions are not seen as direct cooperation with Israel. For this reason, the army has indicated that it will keep its distance from any joint operations or direct military coordination.
Israel's Position
Meanwhile, Israel has made it clear that its complete withdrawal will only be possible when Hezbollah's military infrastructure in southern Lebanon is dismantled and security guarantees are provided. On the other hand, many political parties in Lebanon are demanding Israeli withdrawal first, followed by consideration of other security measures. Due to this disagreement, the process of implementing the agreement remains uncertain.
In reality, while the Lebanese government appears to be fully surrendering to American pressure, a large population within Lebanon is against it. There is a fear that Lebanon might once again face conditions akin to civil war.
